Oh...I understand what you mean now. But the images look excellent on my monitor - very sharp and crisp. BTW, I have never made even one print from any of my digitals...not worth even trying since I know they will be very disappointing. My camera is 2.1 megapixels - not very big for good details and my printer is awful! I've had the digital camera for about a year (Olympus Camedia C-700) and it is really quite amazing in the number of things it does quite well, but it is limited in getting good sharp details for large scenics - that's why I tend to make all my nature scenes 'impressionistic'!
I have'nt used my film cameras for a while now, but I'm feeling I'm ready to go back to them now. The only thing with film or slides is, that I don't have a scanner - so I'd have to get one if I want to show my film images online --- there is always something needed...mostly $$$! HAH!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: Oh, Yes!
Date: 2002-11-20 02:13 pm (UTC)Re: Oh, Yes!
Date: 2002-11-20 02:20 pm (UTC)i'm dreaming to see them printed 50x70 kinda, and with a decent quality... "analogue" photography still knocks to my heart :)
Re: Oh, Yes!
Date: 2002-11-20 04:06 pm (UTC)I have'nt used my film cameras for a while now, but I'm feeling I'm ready to go back to them now. The only thing with film or slides is, that I don't have a scanner - so I'd have to get one if I want to show my film images online --- there is always something needed...mostly $$$! HAH!
I'm enjoying your photos very much!
Best - Joe Z.