Date: 2002-11-19 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] playground.livejournal.com
круто

Oh, Yes!

Date: 2002-11-19 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaarronn.livejournal.com
Very "cool" image. Good Work!

Re: Oh, Yes!

Date: 2002-11-20 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] centralasian.livejournal.com
and yes, there are all digital... of not very good quality, though :(

Re: Oh, Yes!

Date: 2002-11-20 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaarronn.livejournal.com
I think the quality is excellent!

Re: Oh, Yes!

Date: 2002-11-20 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] centralasian.livejournal.com
i meant, #-pixels-wise... i can't print them too large, for example... a4 is a kind of max :(

i'm dreaming to see them printed 50x70 kinda, and with a decent quality... "analogue" photography still knocks to my heart :)

Re: Oh, Yes!

Date: 2002-11-20 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaarronn.livejournal.com
Oh...I understand what you mean now. But the images look excellent on my monitor - very sharp and crisp. BTW, I have never made even one print from any of my digitals...not worth even trying since I know they will be very disappointing. My camera is 2.1 megapixels - not very big for good details and my printer is awful! I've had the digital camera for about a year (Olympus Camedia C-700) and it is really quite amazing in the number of things it does quite well, but it is limited in getting good sharp details for large scenics - that's why I tend to make all my nature scenes 'impressionistic'!

I have'nt used my film cameras for a while now, but I'm feeling I'm ready to go back to them now. The only thing with film or slides is, that I don't have a scanner - so I'd have to get one if I want to show my film images online --- there is always something needed...mostly $$$! HAH!

I'm enjoying your photos very much!

Best - Joe Z.

Date: 2002-12-13 08:34 am (UTC)
Page generated Feb. 27th, 2026 04:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios